Effective sympathetic nerve block for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a case report.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most difficult-to-alleviate side effects of chemotherapy, impacting the patient's daily activities and quality of life and frequently necessitating the discontinuation or dose reduction of anticancer drugs. An effective treatment for CIPN is yet to be established. Herein, we report the case of a patient who developed CIPN after receiving paclitaxel as postoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. The patient experienced difficulties in performing daily activities owing to pain in her fingers and toes despite attempts to treat these symptoms with medications. Stellate and lumbar sympathetic ganglion blocks improved CIPN-induced symptoms of numbness and pain in the extremities. Thereafter, lumbar sympathetic ganglion block was performed once every 6 months, markedly improving the patient's quality of life. Accordingly, sympathetic nerve block can facilitate pain control in patients with CIPN refractory to pharmacotherapy.

Perpendicular and turbulent flow after aortic valve replacement: paravalvular or transvalvular leakage? - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Perpendicular transvalvular leakage (TVL) is occasionally observed after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in biological valves with a stent post, often originating from the base of the stent post. However, an observed perpendicular jet flow is not always a TVL. In rare cases, paravalvular leakages (PVLs) can be perpendicular and are present behind a TVL. In the present case, both PVL and TVL existed simultaneously as unusual perpendicular jet flows that originated from sites in close proximity to the stent post. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old man underwent AVR with a biological valve in the supra-annular position using the non-everting mattress suture technique with pledgets. After weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed an unfamiliar perpendicular turbulent flow, similar to reported TVL, originating from the anterior stent post. Further TEE examination revealed a PVL had originated from the site between the sewing ring at the anterior stent post and native annulus attached to a pledget. The space between the sewing ring and annular retained native portion caused the perpendicular turbulent jet. Consequently, two types of perpendicular turbulent flows, TVL and PVL, existed adjacent to each other. After reinstitution of CPB, inspection of the prosthesis itself indicated it to be normal, but there was a region adjacent to the anterior stent post near the right coronary ostium where the tip of the curved Pean forceps entered between the sewing ring and the native annulus. The region was consistent with TEE findings. AVR was performed with the same prosthesis again. After weaning from CPB, immediate TEE revealed that the unusual perpendicular turbulent flows had disappeared and only a few small TVLs were observed. Regarding the disappearance of TVL, we considered that the fabric region of the prosthetic valve was covered with cellular elements to prevent the leak, as it was already used in AVR once and soaked in blood. CONCLUSIONS: Perpendicular turbulent flow raises the possibility of both TVL and PVL in the case of AVR with stented bovine pericardial valves. For a differential diagnosis of TVL or PVL, it is important to know the surgical procedures and valve morphology.

Feasibility of the head-mounted display for ultrasound-guided nerve blocks: a pilot simulator study.

The head-mounted display (HMD) has the potential to improve the quality of ultrasound-guided procedures. The aim of this non-clinical crossover designed study is to evaluate the feasibility of the HMD for ultrasound-guided nerve block. Eight experienced anesthesiologists performed ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks on a training simulator with a standard approach and with an upside-down approach. Each approach was performed with a control conventional method and with an HMD. The ultrasound image and operating field were recorded by video camera. The procedure time and fractional percentage of time with the needle visible on the ultrasound image were determined. The needle insertion times were 10.4 ± 7.2 s with the control method and 6.8 ± 5.3 s with the HMD method for the standard approach (p = 0.03), and 18.1 ± 10.1 with the control method and 11.8 ± 9.5 s with the HMD method for the upside-down approach (p = 0.002). The fractional percentages of time with the needle visible on the ultrasound image were 34.1 ± 20.9 with the control method and 56.5 ± 13.6% with the HMD method for the standard approach (p < 0.001), and 20.1 ± 13.4 with the control method and 38.2 ± 21.2% with the HMD method for the upside-down approach (p = 0.001). In conclusion, this pilot study using a simulation model indicated that the use of an HMD shortened the procedure time and improved the needle visibility on ultrasound.

[Evaluation of Near-Eye Type We 21Ae Display for Ultrasound Guided Central Venogii,Gannulation].

BACKGROUND: Recently several types of head- mounted displays are available for use in the medical field. Because head-mounted display can provide the visualized information without moving direction of eye- sight, ultrasound guided central venous cannulation might be performed more quickly and safer. One of the head-mounted type displays, Near-Eye Display (NED; NED prototype product, JCV Kenwood, Japan) was tested in ultrasound guided central venous cannulation. METHODS: Eleven experienced anesthesiologists per- formed central venous cannulation on the training sim- ulator with NED and with control method (without NED). Ultrasound real time image and operating field were recorded by video camera and analyzed to iden- tify procedure time, success rate and incidence of unintentional posterior venous wall penetration. RESULTS: With NED, although time required for cen- tral venous cannulation was similar to the time with standard method (31.3 ± 8.7 sec with control and 30.2 ±7.9 sec with NED, P=0.61), unintentional posterior wall penetration tended to occur less frequently (21% with control and 9% with NED, P=0.17). DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: As NED can help practitioners to have both insertion field and ultra- sound image visible without moving eyesight, NED might be a promising assist device for the ultrasound guided central venous cannulation.